Aditya Kannan
HR Batch 2011-2013
Group G
We started today’s business analytics classes with an
overview of another final exam paper in the subject in another institute. We saw that the instructions are
given very clearly about how to obtain results for various analyses such as
first level, frequencies, cross tabs, cluster and factor analysis. The steps
involved in arriving at collated results in table forms, in a crisp manner were
given. The professor has made it easy for us by telling us not to get worked up
about the steps. I completely agree with his point of view that the strategies
to be formed and the final analysis of the data and results are much more
important than the steps. Yes, the steps are important, but even if we make a
mistake in the steps but using the data and results obtained, if our analysis
is correct then we get awarded with marks. If we perform the steps mentioned in
the paper correctly we do get marks for them. That was comforting.
We worked a lot on the Bank loan file. Using this file we
worked on factor, cluster, frequencies and discriminant analysis. We tried to
analyze the credit worthiness of the people, what different factors help us in
deciding whether the person will default on the loan or not. Some of the
factors we saw are age groups, number of years on his job, his income and
address. We had made some hypotheses about the number of people defaulting or
not and we saw how close our predictions are. As learnt from Wikipedia, Discriminant or Linear
discriminant analysis is a method used in statistics, pattern recognition and
machine learning to find a linear combination of features which characterizes or separates two or
more classes of objects or events. The resulting combination may be used as a linear
classifier, or, more commonly, for dimensionality
reduction before later classification. Linear discriminant analysis is
used in bankruptcy prediction, face recognition and marketing.
We worked on Utility analysis. In this we try to find out that
from certain data what is more important to people, their preferences. For
example we worked on what are people’s preferences when it comes to buying a
laptop computer. We tried to find the utility value for three factors, price of
the machine, battery life and its weight. We did this by putting all possible
combinations of the factors and then ranking them on a scale of 1 to 8 with 8
being most preferred and 1 being least preferred. For all combinations we then
added all the rankings and then subtracted the totals for each variable.
We started work on Conjoint. It is about getting answers
for
choices such as for example a direct or flight with a stopover, what
people really want, what they can afford, what he would like to trade-off with
the other choice. The questions are asked jointly as to what is more important
to people. We worked on generating orthogonal design which helps to create the
choices to choose from, what is more preferred.
For conjoint we formed a separate SPSS file called plan, which
concerns career choices. We got the following after forming a file on SPSS.
Company
|
Industry
|
Salary
|
Growth
|
Satisfaction
|
WLBalance
|
Security
|
National
|
Service
|
Above average
|
Medium
|
Moderate
|
No
|
No
|
National
|
Manufacturing
|
Below average
|
Fast
|
Moderate
|
No
|
Yes
|
MNC
|
Manufacturing
|
Above average
|
Medium
|
High
|
No
|
Yes
|
National
|
Service
|
Above average
|
Fast
|
High
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
MNC
|
Service
|
Below average
|
Medium
|
Moderate
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
National
|
Manufacturing
|
Below average
|
Medium
|
High
|
Yes
|
No
|
MNC
|
Manufacturing
|
Above average
|
Fast
|
Moderate
|
Yes
|
No
|
MNC
|
Service
|
Below average
|
Fast
|
High
|
No
|
No
|
It was found that certain combinations were not there such
as the following:-
MNC
|
Service
|
Above average
|
Fast
|
High
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Regarding the absence of the above, we will work on it in
the next class.
No comments:
Post a Comment